For a cheaper, cleaner power grid: CUB, EDF greenhouse gas metric to measure smart grid benefits

A first-of-its-kind metric proposed by CUB and Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) will measure greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions due to groundbreaking smart grid improvements.

The metric was developed in concert with ComEdwhich became the first utility in the country to adopt this greenhouse gas measurement tool.

Calculating the environmental benefits of clean energy investments, like smart meters, is key to promoting the new energy economy. By outlining the emissions savings and operational benefits of advanced meters, this innovative GHG metric provides ComEd the framework to demonstrate the impact of its investments.

Dick Munson, Midwest director of clean energy for EDF, said ComEd is helping to lead the way to a cleaner energy future.

“Utilities should be recognized for putting in place more efficient, smarter energy options, but it’s impossible to know the true value of investments without a way to measure results,” he said. “This metric allows ComEd to definitively show how its smart-grid initiatives are reducing pollution and clearing our air.”

After conducting a series of workshops to identify the best approach, EDF, CUB, and ComEd developed methods to calculate emissions savings due to changes in electricity usage for each hour in the year.

The resulting measurement determines the variable carbon value of a kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity for all 8,760 hours in the year. For example, a kWh saved during an hour of high-carbon intensity, when marginal power comes from coal, is worth more (carbon-wise) than a kWh saved when that power is mostly coming from wind, solar, nuclear, or hydro power. Similarly, a reduction in electric demand that avoids the need for “peaker” plants (dirty power plants typically only used during periods of extreme weather) creates a system-wide environmental benefit.

The metric will capture GHG reductions resulting from a variety of clean energy and smart grid efforts, such as:

  • Enabling energy efficiency and conservation;
  • Reducing peak electric demand;
  • Enabling demand response, an important resource that pays customers to conserve electricity when the grid needs it most; and
  • Enabling the integration of clean, renewable generation sources, like rooftop solar.

Additionally, the metric allows ComEd to count operational benefits, such as the reduced use of meter-reading vehicles. Because it can now receive meter data remotely, ComEd will avoid sending employees to read the device, thus saving money and cutting pollution.

“In Illinois, a smarter grid has the potential to make our electricity system more efficient and cleaner,” said CUB Executive Director David Kolata. “As the nation tackles the issue of carbon emissions, we owe it to consumers to clearly track such benefits.”

While entrepreneurs continue to bring innovation to energy markets in the form of smart appliances, electric vehicles, and affordable, on-site renewable energy generation, utilities need new business models that reward performance and efficiency. Such models depend upon metrics that identify and measure important performance goals, and ComEd is helping to realize that future through the adoption of this metric.

Moreover, by launching its leading smart grid initiative and incorporating 20 different metrics to evaluate its performance, Illinois is at the forefront of grid modernization. The GHG metric is one of those key measures; it allows ComEd to calculate and report on the clean air benefits from advanced metering infrastructure, as well as the programs and technologies they enable. The implementation of this final metric by the state’s leading utility solidifies Illinois’ place as a trailblazer in the clean energy economy.

“The nation is watching how Illinois builds a better power grid,” Kolata added. “Consumer advocates and the Illinois Commerce Commission have worked very hard to make sure that we’re using the right metrics to gauge the consumer benefits of the smart grid.”


About Jim Chilsen

Jim is director of communications for the Citizens Utility Board (CUB)
This entry was posted in ComEd, EDF, Environmental Defense Fund, Smart Grid. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to For a cheaper, cleaner power grid: CUB, EDF greenhouse gas metric to measure smart grid benefits

  1. So, Jim, I am glad to see Cub working on this. I would like to tell you how I cut my costs and emissions. In my 2600 sq. ft. home north of Chicago I noticed about 10 years ago that my biggest source of carbon emissions was due to home heating with natural gas. I decided then that when my gas furnace broke down beyond repair I would replace it with an electric heat pump and shut off the gas. That is what I did in 2013. I replaced my furnace with an air source heat pump. All my gas appliances broke down in the same year so I replaced them with all electric appliances – as of December 2013 I have been totally off the natural gas grid! The total additional cost above a traditional system was only $1,500 – so it’s not like the change cost me a lot of money. Also, I traded my Toyota Corolla for a Chevy Volt. During this past year, I estimate that with a traditional home and car, my costs to keep my home at 72 degrees year round and to drive 10,500 miles in my Corolla would have cost $2,113 and would have led to 22,126 pounds of CO2 released. My actual total energy cost for the year, including gasoline for the Volt, was $1,566 and my CO2 emissions were 19,879. Going all electric saved me money and lowered my emissions.

    Jim, this is the kind of paradigm shift that we need going forward. Going all electric is not on anybody’s radar. But, think of how much going all electric with stimulate demand for wind energy in the winter. Think of how that will lower the emissions per kilowatt hour delivered on the grid, making emissions reductions for the approach even more impressive. Jim, my house is 21 years old with fairly standard construction for the area. Yet, I bet you are not going to find anyone in the area with lower costs or lower emissions for a similar sized house – especially when I run the air conditioner every day in the summer and keep the heat at 72 all winter. If you and Cub are serious about saving people money and cutting emissions, we need to talk.

Comments are closed.